SCALE

Free Online Bioreactor Sizing & Scale-Up Calculator

Step 2 of 7: Establish tank dimensions ($T, H_L, H/D$), impeller sizing ($D = T/3$), and scale criteria translation ($P/V, v_{tip}, \theta_{95}$). • 100% Free & Open Access.

100% FREE STEP 2 OF 7 • UPSTREAM WORKFLOW
Volumetric Scale Factor
1,000 ×
From 5.0 L ➔ 5,000 L
Production Tank Diam (T₂)
1.62 m
Liquid Height: 2.43 m (H/D = 1.5)
Target Impeller Diam (D₂)
0.540 m
D₂/T₂ = 0.333 (Standard)
RPM @ Const P/V (N₂)
96.9 RPM
P/V = 1,180 W/m³ | Tip Speed: 2.74 m/s
SOURCE SKID 1 (PILOT / BENCHTOP) SCALE 1
Working Volume V₁ (L) 5.0 L
Impeller Diameter D₁ (m) 0.053 m
Agitation Speed N₁ (RPM) 450 RPM
Impeller Power Number (Np) 5.00 (Rushton)
Broth Density ρ (kg/m³) 1000 kg/m³
Scale 1 Metrics
P₁/V₁: 1,180 W/m³
v_tip₁: 1.25 m/s
Power P₁: 5.9 W
PROPORTIONAL VESSEL SCHEMATIC & SCALE CRITERIA GEOMETRIC SIMILARITY
Scale 1 5.0 L 1000× Scale 2 5,000 L Target TANK SIZING T₂: 1.62 m H₂: 2.43 m D₂: 0.540 m H/T = 1.5
Target Scale 2 Criteria Comparison Matrix
Scale Criterion Speed N₂ (RPM) Tip Speed v_tip (m/s) Power/Vol P/V Status / Assessment
UPSTREAM HANDOFF ➔ STEP 3
Sized production vessel T₂ = 1.62 m, impeller D₂ = 0.540 m, and scale speed N₂ = 96.9 RPM ready for Hydrodynamics & Mixing Time (Step 3).
TARGET SKID 2 (PRODUCTION VESSEL) SCALE 2
Target Volume V₂ (L) 5,000 L
Aspect Ratio (H_L / T) 1.50
Typical industrial range: 1.2 – 2.0
Impeller-to-Tank Ratio (D / T) 0.333
Standard Rushton D/T = 0.33; Hydrofoil D/T = 0.40
Tank Dimensions (Scale 2)
Tank Diameter T₂: 1.62 m
Liquid Height H₂: 2.43 m
Impeller Diam D₂: 0.540 m
Ungassed Power P₂: 5,900 W (5.9 kW)
Scale Recommendation
Constant P/V Preferred
Maintains oxygen mass transfer capability ($k_La$). Tip speed stays within acceptable shear thresholds.

📚 Stirred-Tank Bioreactor Scale-Up: Constant P/V, Tip Speed & Regime Mapping Upstream Bioprocess • Step 2 of 7

Theoretical Principles & Engineering Fundamentals

Scaling upstream bioprocesses from benchtop fermenters (1L–5L) to pilot (50L–500L) and industrial manufacturing plants (5,000L–25,000L) is a multi-objective optimization problem. Because geometric, kinematic, and dynamic similarity cannot be satisfied simultaneously, bioprocess engineers must select a primary scale-up invariant.

The standard industrial scale-up invariants include:

Governing Equations & Mathematical Formulations

Ungassed Agitation Power P = N_p \times \rho \times N^3 \times D^5
Calculates total mechanical power drawn by an impeller set where $N_p$ is impeller power number, $N$ is agitator speed in rev/s, and $D$ is impeller diameter in meters.
Impeller Tip Speed v_{\text{tip}} = \pi \times N \times D
Governs maximum localized fluid shear stress at the impeller tip, typically constrained to $< 1.8\,\text{m/s}$ for mammalian cells and $< 5.5\,\text{m/s}$ for fungal mycelia.
Scale-Up Speed Translation (Constant P/V) N_2 = N_1 \times \left(\frac{D_1}{D_2}\right)^{5/3} \times \left(\frac{V_2}{V_1}\right)^{1/3}
Relates large-scale agitator RPM ($N_2$) to laboratory scale ($N_1$) under invariant volumetric power dissipation.

Industrial Benchmark Data & Parameter Reference

Scale-Up ParameterConstant P/V ScalingConstant Tip Speed ScalingConstant Mixing Time Scaling
Agitator Speed (N)Decreases as (1/Scale)^(2/9)Decreases as (1/Scale)^(1/3)Remains constant (requires high power)
Volumetric Power (P/V)1.0× (Invariant)Decreases by (1/Scale)^(2/3)Increases by (Scale)^(2/3)
Tip Speed (v_tip)Increases by (Scale)^(1/9)1.0× (Invariant)Increases by (Scale)^(1/3)
Blend Time (θ95)Increases by (Scale)^(2/9)Increases by (Scale)^(1/3)1.0× (Invariant)

Frequently Asked Questions (Bioprocess Engineering FAQ)

Why can't I keep both P/V and mixing time constant during scale-up?
As volume expands by a factor of 1,000, maintaining constant mixing time would require agitator power to scale by $1000^{5/3} = 100,000$, which is physically impossible and would boil the fermentation broth from metabolic and motor heat dissipation.
What is the typical P/V threshold for industrial E. coli fermenters?
Production-scale microbial fermenters typically operate at $1.5 ext{–}3.0 ext{ kW/m}^3$ ($W/L$) under gassed conditions, whereas mammalian cell bioreactors operate at $0.05 ext{–}0.15 ext{ kW/m}^3$.
How does gassing affect impeller power consumption?
Gas sparging creates gas cavities behind impeller blades, lowering the effective fluid density and drag coefficient, typically reducing power draw by 15% to 50% ($P_g/P_0 = 0.5 ext{–}0.85$).