kLa

Free Online Oxygen Mass Transfer (kLa) Predictor

Step 4 of 7: Predict volumetric transfer coefficient (kLa) via Van't Riet gas-liquid correlations from agitation Pg/V & superficial gas velocity (v_s).
100% FREE
STEP 4 OF 7 • UPSTREAM WORKFLOW
Tank diameter D0.50 m
m
Liquid height H0.75 m
m
Impeller diameter d0.18 m
m
Impeller type
Agitation speed N300 rpm
RPM
No. of impellers1
qty
Aeration Rate1.00 vvm
vvm
Media Type
Density ρ1000 kg/m³
kg/m³
Viscosity μ1.0 mPa·s
mPa·s
technical diagram
📊 Volumetric Mass Transfer & Gas Dynamics Outputs LIVE SIMULATION
volumetric transfer kLa
—
h⁻¹
Gassed Power (P/V)
—
W/m³
Superficial Gas Vel (v_s)
—
mm/s
Impeller Reynolds (Re)
—
dimensionless
Aeration Number (Fl_G)
—
dimensionless
Working Volume—
Gassed / Ungassed Ratio (Pg / P0)—
Max Potential OTR—
Impeller Flooding Assessment—

kLa predicted via Van't Riet (1979) empirical correlation. Gassed P/V accounts for dynamic cavity formation and aeration number (Fl_G). Multi-impeller agitation incorporates an empirical n^0.5 enhancement factor.

UPSTREAM WORKFLOW HANDOFF ➔ STEP 5
Predicted volumetric mass transfer coefficient kLa hands off directly into Oxygen Balance (OTR vs OUR) Console (Step 5) to evaluate hypoxia bottlenecks.

📚 Oxygen Mass Transfer (kLa) & Gas-Liquid Dispersion Guide Upstream Bioprocess • Step 4 of 7

Theoretical Principles & Engineering Fundamentals

Oxygen transfer from sparged gas bubbles to the liquid broth is the universal rate-limiting step in aerobic biomanufacturing. Because oxygen exhibits poor aqueous solubility ($C^* pprox 7 ext{–}8 ext{ mg/L}$ at 37°C), maintaining culture viability requires maximizing the volumetric mass transfer coefficient ($k_L a$, hr⁻¹).

The volumetric mass transfer coefficient is predicted using classical empirical correlations developed by Van 't Riet and modified for bioprocess broths:

$$k_L a = lpha imes \left( rac{P_g}{V} ight)^eta imes v_s^\gamma$$

Where $P_g/V$ is the gassed agitation power per unit volume ($ ext{W/m}^3$), $v_s$ is the superficial gas velocity ($ ext{m/s}$), and the coefficients $lpha, eta, \gamma$ reflect coalescing vs non-coalescing fluid electrolyte characteristics.

Governing Equations & Mathematical Formulations

Van 't Riet Non-Coalescing Media Correlation k_L a = 0.0020 \times \left(\frac{P_g}{V}\right)^{0.70} \times v_s^{0.20}
Standard correlation for ionic fermentation broths containing salts, antifoams, and organic metabolites.
Superficial Gas Velocity v_s = \frac{Q_{\text{gas}}}{A_{\text{tank}}} = \frac{4 \times Q_{\text{gas}}}{\pi \times T^2}
Gas linear velocity through the empty tank cross-section ($T$ is tank diameter in meters).
Oxygen Transfer Rate (OTR) \text{OTR} = k_L a \times \left(C^* - C_L\right)
Defines instantaneous volumetric oxygen transfer rate into the bulk culture broth ($ ext{mmol/(L·hr)}$).

Industrial Benchmark Data & Parameter Reference

Broth Chemistry / Vessel TypeAlpha (α)Beta (β)Gamma (γ)Typical kLa (hr⁻¹)
Deionized Water (Coalescing)0.0260.400.5040 – 120
Fermentation Broth (Non-coalescing)0.0020.700.20150 – 500
Mammalian Microcarrier Broth0.00150.600.3015 – 45
Viscous Mycelial Fermentation0.00080.800.1530 – 100

Frequently Asked Questions (Bioprocess Engineering FAQ)

What is the difference between coalescing and non-coalescing fluids?
In pure water (coalescing), gas bubbles rapidly collide and merge into large bubbles with low specific surface area ($a$). Fermentation media contains salts, sugars, and proteins that create electrostatic repulsion, retarding coalescence and increasing $a$ and $k_L a$.
How do antifoams impact kLa in production fermenters?
Chemical antifoams (polyols, silicone emulsions) drastically reduce interfacial surface tension and increase bubble coalescence, commonly lowering $k_L a$ by 20% to 50%.
How does pressure affect oxygen mass transfer?
Operating fermenters at headpressures of 0.5 to 1.5 barg elevates saturation oxygen concentration $C^*$ in accordance with Henry's Law, enhancing OTR driving force without requiring higher agitator RPM.